Advertiser Disclosure: Many of the savings offers appearing on this site are from advertisers from which this website receives compensation for being listed here. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). These offers do not represent all deposit accounts available.

Ask the expert: Has the Fed locked us in?

September 09, 2011

By Richard Barrington | MoneyRates.com Senior Financial Analyst, CFA

Q: Is the recently announced two-year commitment to low interest rates locked in by the Federal Reserve, or can they raise rates before the expiration date? Also, does Ben Bernanke really know what he's doing?

A: The Fed isn't locked into that commitment of keeping rates low for two years--a more accurate description might be "painted into a corner."

Actually, your first question hits on the absurdity of the Fed's announcement. It is ridiculous to announce monetary policy two years in advance, but the announcement is meaningless anyway because the Fed reserves the right to change policy whenever conditions dictate.

So why did the Fed do it? Because the Fed is running out of new tools for stimulating the economy. At the time of the announcement, the financial markets were reeling from the debt ceiling debacle, and the Fed apparently felt it needed something more dramatic than announcing it was keeping rates low yet again. So, Bernanke threw in the two-year commitment wrinkle.

Bernanke should be respected as a hard-working, sincere, and knowledgeable guy. The problem is that the Federal Reserve's power to manipulate the economy is much more limited than the financial press--and often the financial markets--seem to think it is. There are no miracle monetary cures to the current economic problems.

Bernanke is often described as a keen student of history, and this may actually be a drawback in the current situation. He has stubbornly adhered to the classic notion that low interest rates are stimulative, even though that has turned out to be a case of pushing on a string in an environment with low inherent borrowing demand. Perhaps less of a historian would have more of an outside-the-box insight, such as that keeping rates on CDs, savings accounts, and money market accounts down has actually taken some income out of the economy.

Got a financial question about saving, investing, or banking? MoneyRates.com invites you to submit your questions to its "Ask the Expert" feature. Just go to the MoneyRates.com home page and look for the "Ask the Expert" box on the lower left.

Your responses to ‘Ask the expert: Has the Fed locked us in?’

Showing 2 comments | Add your comment

3 October 2011 at 10:02 pm

Rich, Thanks for the answer. Bob

NO stocks 4 me

9 September 2011 at 7:55 am

Quote:: "Perhaps less of a historian would have more of an outside-the-box insight, such as that keeping rates on CDs, savings accounts, and money market accounts down has actually taken some income out of the economy" EXACTLY...... I said this a while back, just think about it, not only retirees have saved some money, there are also a lot of other people ( or were) that also did this CD thing to supplement their usual income. Now, with no COLA and things going up all the time, less jobs available paying anything people would fell a bit better about spending is they at least were still able to get 4 or 5 % on their saved money to tie them over, but NOOOO its take every last cent available by pushing them into risky stocks or out of reach metals. This "smart" fool has single handedly ( well maybe along with the BS BLS) wiped out savings that people esp retirees counted on as a last resort in hard times. And now of course if you are a retiree on SS and medicare, your looked at as "the problem" yeah right, my ass, I never made more than 30K a year working, but never was on food stamps, unemployment, or any other kind of aid, just saved what I could and did without most things, only now to find "i'm the problem" jack ass's

Add your comment
(will not be published, required)