Advertiser Disclosure: Many of the savings offers appearing on this site are from advertisers from which this website receives compensation for being listed here. This compensation may impact how and where products appear on this site (including, for example, the order in which they appear). These offers do not represent all deposit accounts available.

Surprise! The US is due for a recession in 2014

February 04, 2014

| MoneyRates.com Senior Financial Analyst, CFA

Amid all the speculation about whether the economy has recovered enough from the Great Recession for the Federal Reserve to ease up on monetary stimulus, there is one question that is not being asked: Are we due for another recession?

History suggests it is time to start thinking about that possibility. Though it does not seem like it because the recovery has been so halting, it has now been 55 months since the end of the last recession. Since World War II, the average economic expansion has lasted 58.4 months, according to the National Bureau of Economic Research. That would put the start of the next recession some time around this May.

Potential dangers ahead

Of course, these things do not conform to a regular schedule, but it is realistic to assume we are closer to the end of this expansion than the beginning. With the economy still reeling from the last recession, the consequences could be pretty dire if another downturn occurred soon. Here are several reasons an economic slump would be especially hard to take right now:

  1. Over-extended consumers would be in for a shock. With consumer credit at a record high, some people's addiction to credit may be reaching a breaking point. If lenders become more cautious about extending credit during a new recession, people whose lifestyles are dependent on continued borrowing will feel the pinch most severely.
  2. The Federal Reserve may be short of weapons. With short-term rates already near zero and several years of bond purchases it has yet to unwind, the Fed will be hard-pressed to find new monetary policy stimulus measures that are not inflationary.
  3. Fiscal policy will be similarly constrained. The president and Congress will have little additional money to throw at a new recession. They will be tempted to, but with growing international grumbling about U.S. debt, pressure on the dollar may limit the government's ability to spend its way out of the next recession.
  4. Unemployment could get really ugly. If a recession started with unemployment at its current level of 6.7 percent, that would be the second-highest unemployment rate at the start of any recession in the post-World War II era. The only time a recession started with a higher unemployment rate (7.2 percent, in July 1981), the recession lasted 16 months (compared to an average of 11.1 months in the post-war era) and unemployment reached 10.8 percent before it was over.
  5. Rates on savings accounts could get even lower. You might think that savings account rates can't fall any further, but if the economy suffers a relapse, those few banks that have tried to offer higher rates might no longer see any incentive to do so.

Again, economic cycles do not follow a regular schedule, so the next recession may not be right around the corner. Since World War II, economic expansions have lasted as little as 12 months and as much as 120 months. But given the state of the economy right now, would you expect this expansion to have above- or below-average staying power?

Your responses to ‘Surprise! The US is due for a recession in 2014’

Showing 5 comments | Add your comment

26 August 2014 at 11:46 am

Hey, did anyone notice that the first quarter GDP stalled !, literally went negative !...and that is will using bogus deflator. The world is also barely positive in GDP, most are hovering slightly negative. Thats like being in a room with a blow torch full of explosives


26 April 2014 at 6:08 pm

This is a hot topic in my house. Ive been saying that this will happen begining may 2014 for six months. Midterm election this year should pullback and january effect this year too. Since enconomy is not ripe for recession, it would seem that the fed may have to slow the taper. But how can this growth go on. Since the fiat took over the gold standard, lok at how stock chart patterns have changed. It looks like our country needs another good step back to get back on track. Im pulling out of stocks now. Though I will be mad to miss any further price swings. Still contemplating whether or not to trade this fall or to hold cash and wait a few years of low inflation for better prices. The question is when will be the recession. If statistically, recessions start two years after interest rates rise that may not be untill 2017. That would put the bottom in 2019ish. Thats not soon enough.. another note, tm toyata is pulling back almost to 300 ma soon...is toyata a leading indicater.

red pill

4 April 2014 at 9:50 pm

The recession did not end in 2009,10,11 or 12. We are still in a recession. More Americans are homeless, becoming homeless, indentured to government through welfare, hardly any jobs (most of those are filled with new Americans, and by design only available to those able to speak the foreign language of the area), and lets not even begin thediscussion on debt or credit debt. Our economy is rigged to fail. We're going down. I'm calling Timber!!!

Richard Barrington

18 February 2014 at 3:33 pm

Hey Joe, I sympathize with the fact that this economic recovery has been maddeningly slow. However, in economic terms, there is a difference between a slow economy and a recession. A slow economy is one that is expanding at a sub-par pace, whereas a recession is an economy that is shrinking. According to the National Bureau of Economic Research, which tracks official economic cycles going back to the mid-1800s, the most recent recession ended in mid-2009.


11 February 2014 at 10:18 am

Re “Are we due for another recession?”!!! The one we have been for more than 6 years has not ended!! It does not have an end in sight! Richard Barrington must live on another planet.

Add your comment
(will not be published, required)